he will mu*der him, also will be cannibalism

MC gets his revenge, "forces" cannibalism onto the remaining cheater, maggots happen, and the MC gets together with his editor who knows everything. He doesn't get with the Film Emperor, that dude's a pawn.

H is a slag and is cheating MC for a long time with his childhood friend/sweetheart (let's call him CS).

• • If CS did indeed plan to kill H, he would've not scheduled a delivery of the medicine at HIS OWN HOUSE on THE SAME DAY HE WENT OUT WITH HUSBAND, which is COINCIDENTALLY THE SAME DAY OF THE mu*der. Suppose it was done specifically by CS to arrive at that day, why did he not take it with him on their outing? If it was 'accidentally' delivered at that day and he forgot about the delivery, isn't the courier irresponsible for just leaving the package in a home without anyone around (idk in other countries but this can't be done from where I live - someone should always receive a package, even if it's only mail) ? WHY WOULD HE LEAVE SUCH AN OBVIOUS EVIDENCE BEHIND? He's so s*upid to do that if that's true, and if this (leaving behind evidence) is deliberate, the resulting effects does not give him any advantage whatsoever for the case. If he did not plan the mu*der AT ALL, and everything is just plain COINCIDENCE (H just accidentally died there after sex), why would a 'sane' person's response was to CARVE OUT the person's body and EAT him?

• • That last sentence brings me to a very questionable point - WHY IS THERE A KNIFE IN A BEDROOM? Did ANY, JUST ANYONE, of the officers there contemplate on this? I get it if there are food, etc. In the scene (food scraps can be evidence that there was once food in the bedroom) or was once in the scene (an autopsy report or a medical scan of CS's body can prove this), but why would these naive officers focus on the LOCKED DOOR rather than the KNIFE that was taken as the mu*der WEAPON? Suppose CS took the knife in and mu*dered H, then the circumstances in the first bullet will implicate him but would also question if he's being framed. Suppose H took the knife in the bedroom, then that's a whole other story (don't want to elaborate on this since it would take more than just a few sentences). Suppose everything is an accident, why would CS, rather than take the knife and use it to get out of the room or get help, again, use it to EAT H when CS's a 'sane' person (and a celebrity who has to take care of his reputation) ? So many logic holes and probable circumstances, I don't even know in which way I want to investigate if I were there!

• • What kind of person will deliberately save EXTREMELY CASE-RELEVANT INFORMATION in their laptop's HIDDEN FOLDER? Moreover, IT'S A TYPE OF EVIDENCE WHICH MAKES A COMPLETE TURNOVER IN A CASE? I get that people often have a hidden folder, but the files in them are usually important documents (government IDs, company files, etc.), explicit content (videos, pictures, voice records, etc.), or blackmail material, right? Who f*cking saves pictures of their NORMAL day-to-day text conversations in their laptop's HIDDEN FOLDER? Okay, I understand that these kinds of texts (which can be taken as evidence for cheating) needs to be hidden, but keeping it to the point that even the MOST RECENT dialogue of a person's outing is saved, when he can just back-read them (especially the most recent convo) in his own phone (maybe he can save the convo pic at a later date as remembrance of the outing - this logic is so stretched - but definitely not when he's just planning to go) ? This screams staged men!

• • That misdirection - creating a lock room mu*der case instead of a medical-related mu*der case - is brilliant! At first, I thought MC would unlock the door after a few days or weeks since a lock room mu*der will extremely implicate her as a suspect but he can't go back to the scene without a substantial alibi, even if it's just a couple of hours to unlock the door. But then I realize, setting a drug overdose mu*der would implicate her MORE than a mysterious lock room mu*der case - after all, HE'S. THE. FREAKING. LEGAL. PARTNER! HE. SHOULD. KNOW. MORE. ABOUT. HIS. HUSBAND'S. MEDICAL. RECORD. MORE. THAN. THE. MISTRESS! And that's why it's so clever (*laughs maniacally*) !

• • All along the story I thought MC's a one-man performer - setting the stage trap (mu*der), guiding the audience to the expected outcome, etc. - So I was disappointed because having no accomplice in preparing everything, although beneficial since no one knows the secret other than you, limits your perspective in handling a 'perfect stage'. It's just like how one is rated as a 'good movie' - you need to have a good set of main casts, some reactive background characters, and an effective back-stage crew who reviews the plot and/or checks if there are any potential mistakes in the story. I thought MC has no accomplice, but then epilogue came, and it turned out HE HAS SOMEONE MANAGING BEHIND THE SCENES TOGETHER WITH HIM. That's a super pleasant surprise for me!

I can't seem to decide who he really is before the epilogue.

If he's Editor B, which is in line with logic since he said he's been in love with MC for a long time and is then assumed to know MC enough to guess and help him in his mu*der plans, but why would CS worry about his reappearance when there's no indication in the story that they're related in any way (or did I miss something) ? Also, does he have enough 'power' to eliminate some old company men, which from the tone of the chapter, seem to be influential people? Also, why did Elder Brother-in-Law react like that upon meeting him in the asylum, when there's no indication that they've met before?

If he's the Film Emperor (FE), who definitely can affect CS if he reappeared in front of him due to their past relationship, has enough influence due to his background, and already met Elder Brother-in-Law once before the mu*der case establishment, why did he say he's been in love with MC for a LONG time (I don't think 3/4 years can be considered 'long' in this case, so have FE met MC before the story happened) ? Also, he's a famous celebrity 3/4 years ago, so if he lost his memories and was not able to act, how come no one 'noticed' him among those from the forum group?

he's gonna die

kill off the gong for having an affair

but this novel is creepily accurate I was actually scared at some point

the gong deserves this so much, how can he cheated for 10 years? Childhood sweetheart also, , I don't tolerate with cheating everyone, that's their problem for messing with the wrong person

the very sad thing is he absolutely loves the gong for those 10 years, feels bad for the MC but at least he got friends such as the editor b and film emperor, , even though he's just using them

His point of view throughout the story was him telling us a story without any names, it was not suspicious for me at first. Then the conversation between him and his editor somehow got a bit off, especially with the 'minor illness' talk.

And the fact that the editor 'loves' that side of him and is so patient to wait for the MC means he already have done enough mischief in the past that the editor willingly dived in to just to back up MC.

is it the movie emperor or his editor? I'm more leaning towards the editor from the descriptions (the film emperor looks lilke a pretty naive guy to me).

I gotta say, the MC really is something. There’s no actual names being used throughout the entire main story which makes it easier to follow along except during the epilogue where the reader is forced to figure out just who is who. I think it contributes greatly to understanding the personality of the MC as the first-person perspective really shows how detached and emotionless the MC is from the world.