LISTING ALL PEAK NOVELS IVE READ FOR THE PAST 10 YEARS

No description.

Books that hold a very special place in my heart, not only as comfort novels but also as the testament to the beauty of the... more>> fundamentals of science, philosophy, and the human condition. It holds more weight than cheap romance web novels, and gives more pain and emptiness when it ends than a cancelled manga 14 arcs in. <<less

Smart and Strong Fl... more>>

No DAMSEL IN DISTRESS!! <<less

This is a list of all the spell caster novels I have read over the years. I will give some quick thoughts, how far I have... more>> read, and a rating so far. <<less

Magical professions only in the true sense. No Necromancer or Healer only wizards~

Korean novels with witches & wizards, non or protagonists... more>>

In alphabetic order

[PT/BR] Novels coreanas com bruxas & magos, protagonistas ou não

Em ordem alfabética <<less

Serious wizard type novels... more>>

Notable recommendations : Disaster Arrival

If you have any suitable recommendations please let me know <<less

Series where the protagonist uses magic as their main weapon.

Series set in RPG universes that either use D&D's rules or are heavily influenced by them. I'm not guaranteeing quality -- there's at least one... more>> that seriously sucks. It's just a way to make these easy to find for people who've got a particular D&D itch to scratch. I'm on the fence about non-LitRPG xuanhuan series that steal shamelessly *cough* I mean, borrow heavily from D&D. <<less

Grades depend on aperception. Ignore them, read what frees you from the existential horror of being.... more>>

临渊行 SS+ (Lin Yuanxing or Journey on the Brink of Abyss). Oct 21.
Mother of learning SS-. Jan 21.
Original Wizard B+. ~ Apr 21.

SSS - it was incredibly interesting for me to read, I consider it an excellent work, the shortcomings do not strike my eye.

SS - it was very interesting for me to read, I consider it a good work, some shortcomings are striking.

S - I was very interested in reading, the work may be shit, but I was interested in something and did not want to pay attention to the shortcomings.

A - it was interesting for me to read, I think the work is at least normal, there may be many flaws.

B - it was interesting for me to read, it may be shit, there are many shortcomings, but I ignore some.

C - it was a little interesting for me to read, I think the works are shit, there are a lot of shortcomings.

Estimates can be corrected and specified. The meaning can be distorted due to translation.

Although imo the most correct classification would be: what I finished reading was interesting to me at that moment, and what I never finished reading was not. <<less